DANA  Outreach Committee

D.A.N.A. | Downtown Area Neighborhood Alliance | Neighbor to Neighbor

Complete Streets Mobility Plans

Information

Complete Streets  Mobility Plans

The plans for traffic calming and creating bike lanes on Brockton Avenue has generated a great conversation on what is our transportation  - mobility plans for the downtown neighborhoods and throughout Riverside.  DANA will be monitoring and engaging in this conversation.  What are your thoughts, comments....

Members: 4
Latest Activity: May 3, 2013

TRANSPORTATION - MOBILITY PLANS FOR DOWNTOWN RIVERSIDE

Neighborhood Transportation Caucus

ATP - NTC DOCUMENTS 2015

__________________________________________________

Riverside Reconnects | Street Car Study Web site

PE Article - RIVERSIDE: Possible streetcar routes revealed 2.27.15

__________________________________________________

PE Article - RIVERSIDE: City to fix more streets 2.13.15

Mike Gardner ATP update2.pdf (2.07.15)

Brockton Avenue Department of Transportation Grant

Bicycle Transportation Account Guidelines

__________________________________________________

COMPLETE STREETS LAW

CA Safe Routes to School

California Department of Transportation

CA AB 1358 California General Plan Update

CS_Brochure_6_pages_1.pdf

__________________________________________________

COMMUNITY LETTERS

Brockton Support Letter.pdf

ALERT   -  LAND USE COMMITTEE MEETING  MONDAY APRIL 22  6:00pm

LAND USE COMMITTEE MEETING  THURSDAY  APRIL  11

04-11-2013 LUC AGENDA Packet.pdf

LUC Meeting 9.29.11 Complete Streets AB1358

CITY PLANS  -  STUDIES

BROCKTON AVENUE RESTRIPING (powerpoint presentation 3.20.13)

RIVERSIDE BICYCLE MASTER PLAN Update March 2012

CITY COUNCIL REPORTS - COMMUNITY OUTREACH

City Council Report - CCRPT 31 April 17, 2012

City Council Report - Bicycle Program Update March 12, 2013

Neighborhood Meeting on Brockton Avenue Modification 3.20.13

Riveride Bike Trails Map

BRD_diagramFINAL.pdf

MEDIA STORIES

SAN PEDRO BIKE LANES (Thank you MANA for contributing this story)

WOOD STREET STREETS GREEN TEAM CONDUCTING NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY

More bikes less traffic plans for Brockton Avenue 3.20.13

Residents divided on Brockton bike lane proposal 3.20.13

Comment Wall

Comment by Dana Outreach Committee on March 22, 2013 at 6:21pm

WHY BROCKTON  WHY NOW.... ?

Some significant questions on this project.....

1.   Traffic calming measures were taken on Redwood Avenue and Pine Streets

      (converting to one way streets) with the intent of moving traffic to Brockton

2.   Central Middle School property line on Brockton has NO sidewalk...

      There is also a  BIG stretch of Brockton homes who have no sidewalks

      (Rice to Bandini) on the east side of the street

3.    Brockton and Magnolia are two major North South traffic corridors

       The projects on Wells and Watkins are primarily residential streets

       (take a "google map Watkins Ave street view drive .Mt Vernon to Spruce)

4.    The City Council Report on March 12  indicated that the City was

       AWARDED the $420K grant on October 23, 2012 and was

       processing the State agreement in order to receive the funding

Comment by Dana Outreach Committee on March 22, 2013 at 6:35pm

I vote No.  We don’t need more congestion on Brockton.

Comment by Dana Outreach Committee on March 22, 2013 at 6:36pm
Brockton is already so busy that for safety sake I say " no thank you".  
Also I don't think it will be safe for the bike riders. 
With all the underpass construction going on , it makes Brockton awful as a 4 lane road. 
Thank you
Comment by Dana Outreach Committee on March 22, 2013 at 6:37pm

Thanks for an opportunity to weigh in on this important issue.  We have already reduced Redwood (a former connector street) to a two-lane street.  The intent was to divert traffic to Brockton and Market, the two remaining  connector streets.  Now we are trying to divert major vehicular traffic to Market Street ONLY.  We are a large city (over 300,000 residents) but stuck in a small city mentality.  It's insane!

Comment by Dana Outreach Committee on March 22, 2013 at 6:52pm

All I can say is wow.  I really felt like it was a "us vs them" (bikers vs cars) type of meeting. That was disappointing.  I live in Fairmount Park but travel on Brockton Ave

2-4 times a day.  I previously use to take Palm Ave but after they tried to close that street off to non residents I started using Brockton Ave as per the City's request (continued)

Comment by Dana Outreach Committee on March 22, 2013 at 6:53pm

Their specific comment was: "Brockton is meant to handle the overflow traffic from Magnolia and was set up as a major though fare for the downtown residents. "

I also attended the meetings when they first decided to add a bike lane to  Magnolia.  I was against it because of the traffic making the ride unsafe.  So now we have a unused bike lane. (continued)

Comment by Dana Outreach Committee on March 22, 2013 at 6:53pm

Now they are trying to move it to Brockton.  I feel that there are some wonderful ideas proposed that would make Brockton safer. 

However, I don't think it is a good idea to slow the traffic down to 1 lane  on Brockton.  The studies that were done only show the current traffic flow (continued)

Comment by Dana Outreach Committee on March 22, 2013 at 6:54pm

 I feel they should think ahead to the fact that the Riv Comm Hosp is expanding, the new park will have crowds arriving at certain times  ,  and the fact that the schools and businesses need to be accessed in a timely fashion. 

I feel that Brockton is our main route to the central area of Riverside. Especially with the freeway construction.  I am disappointed that we are AGAIN being pushed to use a different route.(continued)

Comment by Dana Outreach Committee on March 22, 2013 at 6:55pm

I was unhappy with the presentation which I felt did not give the negative impact these changes will make. 

I feel that a study based on the time of day the usage takes place would help create a better understanding of the peak times the street is used.  

I feel that the surrounding streets will suffer.  This having to travel greater distances along different routes due to traffic  is certainly not a "green", friendly idea. It will result in back tracking. (continued)

Comment by Dana Outreach Committee on March 22, 2013 at 6:56pm

I also feel that Brockton has other problems that will not be solved with these new ideas.  There are only crosswalks at the lights.  Too many people cross in the middle of a block to be safe.  (Especially kids,walkers,  bikers and skateboarders).  I feel that  this will cause problems with the traffic flow. 

I think moving the bike lane to Palm Ave is the better solution.

Thank you for this opportunity to voice my opinion.

Comment

You need to be a member of Complete Streets Mobility Plans to add comments!

 

Members (4)

 
 
 

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Notes

DANA 2015 Priorities Survey

Created by Dana Outreach Committee Feb 16, 2015 at 11:28am. Last updated by Dana Outreach Committee Feb 18.

RPU UPDATE 7.21.14

Created by Dana Outreach Committee Jul 22, 2014 at 6:13am. Last updated by Dana Outreach Committee Jul 22, 2014.

2012-2013 City of Riverside | Economic Development Plan

Created by Dana Outreach Committee Feb 28, 2012 at 7:16pm. Last updated by Dana Outreach Committee Jun 24, 2014.

SOLAR BEE | Fairmount Park

Created by Dana Outreach Committee Aug 28, 2012 at 10:49am. Last updated by Dana Outreach Committee Jun 24, 2014.

Brockton Avenue Project May14 - Aug14

Created by Dana Outreach Committee May 5, 2014 at 7:12pm. Last updated by Dana Outreach Committee May 19, 2014.

© 2015   Created by Dana Outreach Committee.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

google-site-verification: googlee2f320619ecd55e9.html